per2 anti rabbit (Novus Biologicals)
Structured Review

Per2 Anti Rabbit, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/per2 anti rabbit/product/Novus Biologicals
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Circadian rhythms in pediatric high-grade gliomas may contribute to treatment efficacy"
Article Title: Circadian rhythms in pediatric high-grade gliomas may contribute to treatment efficacy
Journal: Scientific Reports
doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-17461-9
Figure Legend Snippet: Circadian gene expression varies between pHGGs and pLGGs. ( A ) Interleaved scatter plots represent bulk RNA sequencing (rsem FPKM) analysis comparing circadian gene expression across pediatric low-grade glioma (pLGG, n = 426, blue) and pediatric high-grade glioma (pHGG, n = 211, red) samples from the Pediatric Brain Tumor Atlas (PBTA, Provisional). Data are expressed as mean ± SEM, and expression values are log₂-transformed FPKM counts. Statistical analysis was performed using a two-way ANOVA with Benjamini and Hochberg false discovery rate (FDR) to determine differences in gene expression between pHGGs and pLGGs. Each dot represents an individual tumor sample. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences (* P < 0.05), while “NS” denotes non-significant comparisons. ( B ) Western blots of four representative pediatric high-grade glioma tissue samples (left) and four pediatric low-grade glioma tissue samples (right) comparing BMAL1, CLOCK, PER2, and REV-ERBα protein expression (sections of separate blots displayed; full blots are shown in Supplementary Figure S3). Of note, tissue sample HGG 3 is derived from the same patient as the STN-49 cell line. ( C ) Normalization to β-ACTIN control reveals BMAL1 ( p < 0.05, 1.57 vs. 0.98) and CLOCK ( p < 0.05, 0.98 vs. 0.39) protein expression is higher in high-grade gliomas compared to low-grade gliomas, REV-ERBα is lower ( p < 0.05, 0.12 vs. 0.55), and there are no significant differences in PER2 protein expression. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM.
Techniques Used: Gene Expression, RNA Sequencing, Expressing, Transformation Assay, Western Blot, Derivative Assay, Control

